Saturday, December 16, 2017 | site map | contact | FSJ

Subscribe to Salvo magazine today! Take a look at an issue online and if you like what you see, SUBSCRIBE at a discounted rate.

You Can Be Part of Salvo By Supporting Its Mission Today

We depend on all our great readers to keep Salvo going!

Follow Salvo online



Join Our Email List
Enter your email below:
 



Further Reading

Surveillance

Death Pushers of America

The Drug Policy Alliance

by Terrell Clemmons

Article originally appeared in
Salvo 36

Background

The Drug Policy Alliance (DPA) was formed in 2000 as the merger of the Drug Policy Foundation, a grant-making non-profit, and the Lindesmith Center, an Open Society Institute project funded by hedge fund billionaire and former Nazi collaborator George Soros. Headquartered in New York City, with offices in five states and Washington, D.C., DPA is one of a plethora of well-funded drug legalization advocacy groups. Others include the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML) and the Marijuana Policy Project (MPP).

Reason for Surveillance

According to its website, DPA "envisions a just society in which the use and regulation of drugs are grounded in science, compassion, health and human rights . . . and in which the fears, prejudices and punitive prohibitions of today are no more." Its mission is "to advance those policies and attitudes that best reduce the harms of both drug use and drug prohibition, and to promote the sovereignty of individuals over their minds and bodies."

DPA pursues these objectives primarily through an array of communication strategies. For example, it promotes ballot initiatives for changing drug laws at all levels, publishes drug education materials for teens, and conducts media campaigns aimed at changing public opinion. Arguments are usually variations on a few liberal-sounding slogans such as: The war on drugs results in mass incarceration and wastes billions of taxpayer dollars; Drug laws unfairly affect women, minorities, and people of color; Users are going to use anyway, so we should cut our drug-war losses; and, Legalization is a humanitarian struggle for freedom and liberty. In its advocacy, DPA speaks much of "human rights" and "harm reduction."

Human rights and harm reduction are certainly noble ideals, but what DPA actually pushes for is the removal of all barriers, legal and social, to all uses of all drugs—in other words, full-on legalization. In 2013, DPA Director of Media Relations Tony Newman wrote, "My colleagues and I at the Drug Policy Alliance are committed to ensuring [that] the decriminalization of all drug use becomes a political priority."

This, we are to believe, is compassion? This is the way to health and harm reduction? No, the bad faith behind DPA advocacy can be seen through Newman's own backdoor admission that using is harmful, which he acknowledged when he argued in the very same article that, "as long as drug use is a crime, people are going to be afraid to get help."

So, we might ask, which is it that users really need? Unencumbered access to drugs? Or help getting off drugs? Certainly there is room for improving laws in order to reduce harm, but to push for full-on legalization under the guise of compassion and harm reduction stretches credulity and more closely aligns DPA with drug pushers than with policy advisors.

Most Recent Offense

In May 2015, DPA broadcast a webinar on "Expanding Harm Reduction Through Human Rights." Holly Bradford, one of the four presenters and Program Coordinator for the San Francisco Drug Users Union (SFDUU), talked up drug user empowerment and made a case for so-called Supervised Injection Facilities (SIFs) run by users. (No word on who would pay for the supplies and services.) One of the benefits she mentioned of an SFDUU site was that, "We came together to support each other and to grieve our members when they died."

Certainly compassion should move us to help meet the needs of drug users. But straightforward, evidence-based thinking also tells us that removing all barriers to drug use neither helps users nor reduces harm. Unless all they need is someone to support them in their dying. 


If you enjoy Salvo, please consider giving an online donation! Thanks for your continued support.

FROM THE CURRENT ISSUE

A Boy's Life: 5 Recommendations for Shielding Our Sons from the Anti-Culture—And Setting Them Towards Manhood by Anthony Esolen

Revolution 101: How the 'New Civics' Is Fomenting Civil Unrest by Terrell Clemmons

Up for Grabs: In Science, When 'Anything Goes,' Everything Goes by Denyse O'Leary

Optimal Optics: Evolutionists Don't Know a Good Eye When They See One by Jonathan Wells

FROM PAST ISSUES

The Darwin Tales: It's Time to Remit Darwinian Storytelling to the Annals of History by Terrell Clemmons

Engendered Confusion: The Chaos of Postmodern Sexuality by Laurie Higgins

Zombie Killer: The "Icons of Evolution" Have Joined the Ranks of the Undead by Denyse O'Leary

My Favorite Zombies: Can We Let Them Rest in Peace? by James M. Kushiner

Eye Openers: Eight Common Factors for Atheists Changing Their Minds About God by Matt Nelson

Tuning Out the Universe: How Naturalism & Post-Fact Science Ignore the Evidence We See by Denyse O'Leary

Deep-Seated Rights: What They Are & Why You Have Them by Steve Jones

Improbably So: Fine-Tuning Is Unlikely, but Unlikely Things Happen All the Time by Tim Barnett

The Long Red Shadow: Mike Shotwell Has a Message for Millennial America by Terrell Clemmons

The Good Life: It's to Know, Serve & Love the Truth, Not the Pursuit of Happiness by James Altena

Taking Polls Apart: Human Complexity Foils Electoral Predictions by Denyse O'Leary

Morality as Story: The False Charity of Modern Journalism by Rebekah Curtis

Can We Talk?: It Is Crucial That We Put Our Minds to Contentious Issues by James M. Kushiner

© 2017 Salvo magazine. Published by The Fellowship of St. James. All rights reserved. Returns, refunds, and privacy policy.