She meant to say “people of color” instead of “colored people.” Oh, so that’s how it works! You just need to switch around the word-order and then it’s not offensive anymore. It all makes perfect sense now.
Frankly, I find this entire story offensive so I mixed it and fixed it for you, dear readers.
Robach, in a Monday-issued apology, stated that what she said was “a reflection NOT of how I feel or speak in my life everyday,” and that “color-positive people” is what she had meant to say.
. . . Last week, DePaul University informed the DePaul Young Americans for Freedom chapter (of which I am Vice Chairman) that they plan to partake in this attack. DePaul University has banned conservative commentator Ben Shapiro from appearing on campus. Mr. Shapiro’s strong defense of the Constitution and conservative values is apparently too much for the University and its students to handle. . . .
The evidence is actually the other way around. Higher education boards are stuffed with wall st tycoons and “foundation” representation. The agendas are so twisted to be run like a business, you end up with blowhard disinformation campaigns like this. It’s the information age, all the presumptive statements here are easily refuted.
I’m glad we have naysayers and they are always welcome to say their nays on our fb posts, but I just wanted to share this story with you as a followup—this being the information age and all. In the case of Mr. Shapiro, I wish the tycoons, fat cats, and foundations would of helped him out.
See below for more blowhard disinformation from your friends at Salvo.
Dee hopes the 2016 “Superhumans” advertising video will not only go viral in England but around the world and bring enhanced awareness to those with disabilities.
“The thing that stands out to me is that people should see people with disabilities as having the ability to live a life that is worthwhile,” he said. “So I feel very strongly about being pro-life and am very concerned about the moves towards a society where we have couples becoming pregnant expecting a baby who might have a disability and then getting rid of the baby way too easily.”
The Jefferson Memorial in the spring with cherry trees.
In his “Notes on the State of Virginia” Jefferson rhetorically asked, “Can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are a gift of God?”
Our Founding Fathers realized that rights and freedoms depend on citizens whose darker angels are restrained by a received moral code. John Adams put it this way: “We have no government armed with the power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion.”
For the founders, moral truth was not a matter of empirical observation, personal opinion, or popular consensus; rather, it was the product of an external source of knowledge: the divine mind of God. Without a transcendent origin, moral codes become matters of power and politics. Rights and freedoms—and who has claim to them—are then neither inalienable nor durable, but subject to the caprice of the tyrant or the tyranny of the crowd.
The atrocities committed during the last century by the regimes of Stalin, Hitler, Mao, and Mussolini are sufficient to disabuse all but the most glassy-eyed dreamers of the futility of producing a moral society from a purely secular state.
Looking for some ideas for Summer reading? Well if you have an issue of Salvo lying around,* flip to the back and you’ll find a regular department called the “Blips.” There you will find a full page review of a book or a movie we think Salvo readers will want to know about, as well as ten to fifteen shorter mentions of interesting titles available.
Last week, a young Christian male asked me a pretty direct question. He wanted to know whether I ever worried that my blunt commentary on social media was “turning people away from Christianity.” I thought it was an honest question. So I gave him an honest answer. I told him that I believe the problem is just the opposite of what he considers it to be. In other words, it isn’t occasional blunt commentary that turns people away from Christianity. It is the constant displays of Christian cowardice that make people both reticent to join and quick to attack us. . . .
If you’ve spent any amount of time flipping through an issue of Salvo or perusing salvomag.com, you will have noticed that we agree with Mr. Adams assessment. You can read more about the good professor in the Salvo archives:
And related to the title of this post, here’s a good article from Salvo contributing editor Regis Nicoll.
Speak No Evil
Judging by the New Blasphemy Code, Moral Views Are Excluded
. . . The person who can’t or won’t discern good from evil is destined to be a victim of those who are adept at disguising one as the other. Thus, abstaining from moral judgments is not a hallmark of nice people, but of foolish ones. And the person who makes judgments while insisting that he doesn’t or shouldn’t is naive, if not hypocritical. . . .