Nothing Left to Parody?

The new Salvo (Issue 33, Summer 2015) is now available both online and in print. We here at Salvo have always enjoyed coming up with new fake ads–our attempt to point out some of the irrational thinking/feeling that defines our self-proclaimed science-loving culture. In this issue, we ran the fake ad below:

Obviously this one is an attempt to parody a culture whose main virtue is “being yourself,” even if that means running from the physical and mental reality of yourself.

Well, today I saw this in the news: ‘Black’ NAACP leader outed as white woman.

So my honest question for you, dear readers, is this: Are parody and satire even possible these days?

Further reading: Here is a good article from Touchstone that addresses some of the issues behind natural law arguments, and the attitude of those who do hold to the idea of natural law. And guess what: it has nothing to do with “hate.” From Of Bicycles, Sex, & Natural Law: Describing Human Ends & Our Limitations Is Neither Futile Nor Unloving by R. V. Young.

Some readers may regard an assertion of natural moral principles as unfeeling, heartless, cruel. It is, to the contrary, an expression of Christian love, or charity. St. Thomas Aquinas defines charity as willing the good of another. To shrug our shoulders and look the other way at the prospect of another man maiming himself for the sake of an erotic fantasy, because we don’t wish “to hurt his feelings,” is at best sentimentality, at worst a neglect of his human dignity. Genuine love is not sentimentality; it is not a vague emotion. Condoning another man’s irrational, self-destructive behavior is certainly not willing his good.

Salvo Senior Editor Marcia Segelstein on “The real truth about sex”

The Real Truth About Sex: What we’re not telling our kids
by Marcia Segelstein, Fox News Opinion

We’re a culture obsessed with parenthood, or “parenting,” as we like to call it.  Countless websites, books, and magazines provide advice for parents aspiring to perfection. And paramount on any good parent’s priority list is making sure our kids are safe and healthy.  So we pay extra for organic milk and banish trans fats from our kitchens.  We deliberate over the safest car seats and sign petitions to ban sodas from school cafeterias.  We talk to our kids early and often about the dangers of smoking, drinking and drugs.

But when it comes to the hazards of sex, our approach falls somewhere between passivity and paralysis.  For whatever reasons – concern about imposing fear and shame, embarrassment about being hypocritical, or not believing that kids are capable of self-control – we can’t bring ourselves to just say “don’t!”  We make sure our kids know about condoms and the Pill, and tell them we’re always there if they want to talk.  Which is the equivalent of shutting our eyes, crossing our fingers, and hoping.  Hoping that our kids won’t get pregnant, or get someone else pregnant.  Hoping that they won’t catch that STD that causes infertility or cancer.  Hoping the chemical bonds that they form and then break won’t break their hearts.

Because here’s the rub.  It is an indisputable fact that having sex means taking risks. . . . read the rest

A Physician’s Tribute: “Thank You Fr. Roman”

by James M. Kushiner

Dr. Dan Hinshaw has written this moving tribute to Fr. Roman Braga, who fell asleep in the Lord on April 28 in Michigan. Part of the story of Fr. Roman’s life is told in this Fr.RomanB 150x150 A Physicians Tribute: Thank You Fr. Romaninterview I did with him in 2011 for Salvo.

Fr. Roman was actually a fan of Salvo magazine, and asked about its welfare the last time I saw him in 2013, even after he knew he was dying from cancer. He even donated regularly to help support Salvo, which he told me, with a smile, was “a scary magazine!” If you’d like to add your support to his, your gift made here will also be doubled by a generous donor who is offering us a $50,000 matching grant.

I will miss Father Roman. Memory eternal!

Feeling Trans

Smith’s Transgender Delusion
The women’s college unwittingly undermines the ‘transgender moment.’

by Jonathan V. Last, The Weekly Standard
For the better part of a year, Smith College has been telegraphing that it would soon accept transgender student applications. On Monday, the women’s college flung open the curtain on its new admissions policy. And whether it realizes it or not, Smith has inadvertently done a great deal of damage to the idea of transgenderism. Indeed, Smith’s new official transgender policy suggests that, at least in some cases, the “trans” idea is merely make-believe.

I recommend this article to you that dissects the policy of Smith College regarding admissions. Last does a great job breaking down the logic of it all. But that’s just the trouble, the debate on these issues will not be “won” by logic or sound argument or appeals to reason. This debate rests entirely with feelings and vague ideas of fairness and rights.

As Regis Nicoll pointed out in his article Hooked on a Feeling Is Gender Just a State of Mind? for an early issue of Salvo:
By invoking the term “rights,” the lifestyle Left has elevated the unfettered exercise of expression over the physical safety of women, clearing the way for absurd and dangerous outcomes like the MTA decision. Did I mention that this all began in reaction to women’s exploitation?
The next issue of Salvo is in production. Stay tuned!

Kim Kardashian, Real Housewives, and RFRA

by Peter Johnson

A friend of mine—who happens to be gay—has refrained from commenting on the Indiana RFRA. That is, until last night, when he couldn’t help himself and tweeted this: “No self-respecting gay man would serve pizza at his wedding.” I think this tweet pretty much sums up this latest tempest in a teapot.

In a former life, I spent two years in rural Paraguay teaching beekeeping to subsistence farmers. I had no phone, no access to the Internet. About once a month I would ride 9 hours by bus to the capital to do emails, catch up on the latest American news. Could you imagine what I might think about the US, were this still how I got my news? Let me paint a picture of the headlines I might be reading:

Look, I get it. Clickbait pays. Internet traffic is as good as money your pocket these days. In my day job, I raise money for a conservative think tank and often use stats on our organization’s Internet traffic to make a case for support.

Not too long ago I took an op-ed writing class from Sam Ryan, a WSJ reporter turned entrepreneur who now runs a well-respected full-service PR firm in Washington DC that places thousands of op-eds a year for clients. Best memory from this class was trying to shoehorn the name “Kim Kardashian” into an op-ed headline. Sam explained that based on the title alone, an editor oftentimes chooses the top three or four editorials from dozens or hundreds received every day. Putting “Kim Kardashian” (or another degenerate national obsession, ie #RHWBH) in the headline would ensure that our op-ed made the initial cut.

So, again, I get it. None of us are immune from the demands of an oversaturated media market. Ambitious reporters are sent on missions to find bigots—and when they can’t find any—they’ll just manufacture one. Organizations (like the one I work for) who have long been staunch—though measured—advocates for religious liberty are being crowded out by fly-by-night operations that post poorly researched articles with outrageous headlines in order ride the wave of publicity. So, in response, normally restrained organizations like mine up the ante: They post pieces like the one that makes that case that one tweet from a dummy is evidence of burgeoning genocidal tendencies in our society.

Of course, there are the exceptions. The Federalist recently ran a piece that asked both advocates and opponents of gay marriage to write about what most troubles them about their positions. In an age of take-no-prisoners polemics, this was a very refreshing way to treat a subject that continues to be a divisive issue in our country.

So in that tradition, here is my response to the ongoing controversy in Indiana: Freedom of conscience—of which religious liberty is inextricably linked—is perhaps the most important freedom that we possess in this country. I think most people would agree that this is probably the defining characteristic of our great country. Because of this, I think anything that challenges this freedom should be taken seriously. Freedom of conscious is the wellspring of good citizenship and legal protections for free association and freedom of conscience are, in my estimation, foundational for a virtuous citizenry.

That being said, I think that people who share my opinion need to reduce the temperature on the rhetoric about the “attacks on religion.” As someone whose great-grand parents were German Jews who actually lived through Kristallnacht, I would hope we would reserve the holocaust analogies for when there is real violence happening (like, maybe, the sort of stuff happening to Christians in Iraq and Syria). Anti-RFRA tweets don’t tempt Kristallnacht any more than the RFRA itself tempts hate crimes on homosexuals, right?

Experience tells me that in America homosexuals are at greater risk for discrimination, bullying, and violence than devout Christians. I don’t need stats to back this up (though I’m sure someone is keeping tally out there). Anyone who has gone to an American public school in the 50 years knows this is true. While kids going to school today are less likely to bully a gay classmate than they were, say, 20 years ago, I still think it is much more likely that a gay student is bullied than a devout Christian. And it is this truth about our culture that gives me pause when I advocate for laws like RFRA.

Peter Johnson is a graduate of New York University where he studied English and philosophy. After graduation, he lived and worked in Africa and in South America, where he taught beekeeping to rural subsistence farmers. Before joining the Development team at Acton, he held various positions with the National Capital Area Council, Boy Scouts of America. Peter is married to Ashley, a teacher, and has three children.