by Greg Koukl The view that science and religion don’t mix is guilty of at least three logical errors. New Balance 420 hombre Ernie Banks Jersey First, it commits the either/or fallacy by asserting that a view is either scientific or religious. adidas ultra boost uncaged uomo Fjallraven Kanken Classic Intelligent design has been pegged as a religious view, and therefore as non-scientific. buy mu legend redzen
But in fact, there is scientific evidence to support design models. mu legend zen online asics gel lyte 3 mujer rojas And we see the blending of science and religion in Big Bang cosmology, which posits that the universe had a beginning, thus implying the existence of a creator. Second, it commits the straw-man fallacy by assuming that creationists make no use of scientific methods. Scarpe Adidas asics gel nimbus 17 uomo This is not the case. nike air max 90 pas cher Creationists would be happy to present a ton of scientific evidence for their view, if they were allowed to. nike tn rouge This evidence needs to be addressed instead of disqualified. kobe 11 pas cher Third, it assumes that the reigning scientific views do not have religious significance. This is false. cheap mu legend redzen New Balance 420 hombre All cosmological views have religious significance. Buy MU Online Legend Power Leveling adidas alphabounce hombre If evolutionary naturalism is true, then the only place for God is in the imaginations of believers. A clear, hard line between religion and science just isn’t possible. Canotte Golden State Warriors Canotte Toronto Raptors Instead, the two should work together, and the strengths of each should be drawn upon to give us a total picture of reality. scarpe nike uomo in offerta
This short piece originally appeared as a sidebar to “‘Faith’ No More” from the Salvo Science and Faith supplemental issue. mu legend redzen Nike Air Max 2016 Heren grijs Subscribe to Salvo today to receive the issue free.